The word "plight" is one which has recently been brought to my notice via crosswords. We have all heard of "plight one's troth" which, in modern times, usually means that a person has agreed publicly to marry someone. But what does the word plight really mean? Apparently it has two different meanings. One is to publicly "pledge" to a commitment of some kind, which is not related to goods or property; some sort of promise to another person to do something. The other meaning of plight is related to a situation. We all know of the plight that someone is in, usually something dangerous. But apparently, in my very old dictionary this word can relate to any situation, good or bad, and often means "perpelexing", which is how the dangerous aspect comes about as a person in a perplexed state is often confused/uncertain how to proceed, and as such may not be aware of a danger ahead of them.

Troth is an alternative word for "truth". Betrothal, was always related to promising to marry, and it is the only form we ever use the word, troth, today. Whilst not a word ordinarily spoken and used, it nevertheless is often read in books which cover a historical period when betrothals were more common.

As for anomolous actions: how is it that (in the UK at least) ordinary people who seek work must go through a long complex "equal opportunities" procedure, even if you have already done the job but are subject to a "reorganisation" of the workforce (usually indicating a reduction in staff numbers) and must reapply for the job you have been doing, yet when it comes to the high flying top echelon of business/organisation they are "headhunted", that is sought specifically and offered terms to change allegiances even when the person isn't seeking work? (sorry for such a long sentence). But surely, ALL people should be subject to the same "equal opportunities" procedure? Why are the top personnel allowed to be treated differently? All people have skills that are sought. Surely, if you know how good someone is it should be possible to select the appropriate personnel from those who have already shown their aiblities? It will always remain an anomoly of attitude and thought to me.

Just a few points worth pondering upon.